![sparkbox dayton sparkbox dayton](https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/314621/screenshots/6860333/foundry-refresh_detail-page_4x.jpg)
We don't want people to stay on the site for very long since it's for a utility company. We had some initial metrics which we aimed to improve. The project was completed 18 months later, and the website is live. We started working with Sparkbox in February 2015. The cost of Sparkbox's work was over $100,000. Based on a group evaluation, Sparkbox was chosen as the top vendor, and awarded the contract. We sent out requests for quote, reviewed each respondent, and selected a top 5 for interviews. We have a strict process for evaluating companies. The work was managed as with one single team. We merged our two teams together and had daily stand-ups across videoconferencing. There were four or five developers from our side assigned to the project, and five or six from Sparkbox's side, depending on the phase. We used several build tools.Įverything below the web stack was made up of our Java API layer, and Sparkbox did not have an involvement there.
SPARKBOX DAYTON CODE
The code stack also included Apache Web Server, MySQL, PHP, CSS, and JavaScript. The content was built using ExpressionEngine, while the functionalities were built through EmberJS. With the help of Sparkbox, we built a responsive website which both manages content and has all the real-time functionality of its previous rendition. Overall, it ended up being a fine approach because Sparkbox kept us up to date on those hours and made sure that we were prioritizing the most important work. If the project went over our set number of hours, we'd have to spend more, rather than have a set fee for all the work. The hourly model can be a challenge for some companies as it was for us. I can't think of any specific things which could have been improved. We have used this information on our own projects.Īre there any areas Sparkbox could improve? They shared their whole philosophy in terms of identifying audiences and creating wireframes, designs, and frontend components. One of the outstanding things about Sparkbox is that they didn't just provide a service, they also educated us about their process. What did you find most impressive about Sparkbox? Once the development started, we used GitHub Issues and ZenHub to keep track of tasks and issues. We used InVision for sharing and commenting on designs. Much of our collaboration was done through shared Google Drive documents.
![sparkbox dayton sparkbox dayton](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/r_0cjVWlTq4/maxresdefault.jpg)
This helped us keep an eye on our overall budget and prioritize on a regular basis. They kept us updated every week about how many hours we'd used, how many remained, and the estimated total. We were given a range of what each phase of the project would likely entail in terms of number of hours. Sparkbox' business model is based on hourly rates. How did Sparkbox perform from a project management standpoint? We went from getting no contacts whatsoever to getting around 20–30 per month. After the redesign, the contact form became much more prominent with a clear path for educating and inspiring professionals. We had a contact form on our previous website but had never really gotten leads from those professionals. One of the primary goals of our website redesign was targeting professionals such as homebuilders, remodelers, and architects who could use our products in their projects. The cost of Sparkbox' work was between $50,000 and $100,000.Ĭould you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement? How much have you invested with Sparkbox? Sparkbox seemed to be the best fit as a partner their proposal hit the mark in terms of what we were looking for. We used an RFP process that involved three firms in total. I was very impressed by their expertise and quality of work. I’ve attended some of the frontend development and design workshops that Sparkbox ran in the past. The technologies used for our pattern library were HTML, CSS, SAS, JavaScript, and Atomic Design. There were three developers working on our project. We worked with a number of people from the Sparkbox team, including their UX and UI designers, their project manager, and content strategist. Sparkbox worked on the site's overall design, identifying our target audiences and building the pattern library based on that architecture.